Episode Two: Redesigning the Election

Posted December 18, 2007 by BDP Staff

peoplevote.jpg

The presidential candidates are spending a lot of time and money in Iowa and New Hampshire these days, but historically elections have been decided by voters in Ohio. In this episode, John Hockenberry and Adaora Udoji head to Cleveland to pose the question: What if the Ohio primary came first? And they talk to people around the country about how they would change the election process.

Listen to the entire episode:

If you do not see flash audio player please install the latest flash player.

Read the full episode transcript

Why Not Ohio?

So, what if the Ohio primary went first? Ohio perhaps better represents the U.S. than Iowa or New Hampshire does — it’s more diverse both geographically and racially, it has more people, and it has a better track record for picking winners (the voters in Ohio have been wrong in the presidential election only twice in past 104 years). Adaora and John talk about how our system got the way it is and then talk to some Ohio voters before running the whole thing by Dan Moulthrop, the host of WCPN’s The Sound of Ideas.

If you do not see flash audio player please install the latest flash player.

Mrs. Kunkel’s Fifth Grade Class Redesigns

From Boiling Springs, PA - Mrs. Jan Kunkel’s fifth grade class present their election redesign ideas.

If you do not see flash audio player please install the latest flash player.

Mrs. Kunkel’s class made posters to go along with their election ideas. Watch this slideshow to get a sense of what’s on their minds.

Redesign With Mrs. Kunkel’s Class


BSPA1

You Call This Democracy?

Tova Andrea Wang is an expert on election reform and a democracy fellow at the Century Foundation. Be sure to check out her report on why the Iowa caucus system is undemocratic.

Roberto Lovato is a contributing associate editor with New America Media, a frequent contributor to The Nation and the author of the blog, Of America.

If you do not see flash audio player please install the latest flash player.

Election Process Side Effects

Voting is good for you, unless…

If you do not see flash audio player please install the latest flash player.

Praying for Rain

Daniel Tokaji is a law professor at Ohio State’s Moritz College of Law and the associate director of Election Law @ Moritz, which focuses on laws governing elections at all levels. He’s one of the authors of the non-partisan report, From Registrations to Recounts: The Election Ecosystems of Five Midwestern States.

Fannie M. Lewis is a member of the Cleveland City Council. She was featured as part of the short film, No Umbrella, about the 2004 election in one of the nation’s poorest neighborhoods. Here’s a preview:

If you do not see the video please install the latest flash player.

Also, we hear redesign ideas from two students at Cleveland’s John Marshall High School - Jewel Dunner and Francisca Ong.

If you do not see flash audio player please install the latest flash player.

Margin of Error

Charles Stewart is a political science professor at MIT. He’s studied elections for a long time and we talked to him about whether you can determine a margin of error for the general election. We asked him if there comes a point where the margin of error is close enough that the result is the same as flipping a coin.

If you do not see flash audio player please install the latest flash player.

Election Splendor

We talked with Cleveland cartoonist Harvey Pekar about our idea that Ohio should go first.

Then, Los Angeles-based community leader and activist Joe Hicks explains why he believes our election systems isn’t so broken that it needs fixing.

And, Toledo based blogger, Lisa Renee Ward, says her favorite redesign is instant run-off voting. She blogs at: Glass City Jungle.

Take a look at Harvey Pekar’s Your Billion Dollar Comic Strip

If you do not see flash audio player please install the latest flash player.

First Time Voters

Sandip Roy and Odette Keeley from New America Media have recently become American citizens. Their experience of voting in their native countries gives them some interesting suggestions for redesigning a process they will soon be taking part in for the first time, a U.S. presidential election.

And, we have a quick redesign idea from Jonathan Lykes. He’s a senior at Shaw High School in East Cleveland.

If you do not see flash audio player please install the latest flash player.

Super Tuesday is a Redesign

Mary Ann Giordano is a deputy political editor at The New York Times. She’s learned a thing or two about how the pressure on candidates to compete in Iowa and New Hampshire can change their campaigns. She says this year’s Super Tuesday (February 5, 2008) when more than 20 states will hold their primary, is the biggest redesign idea already underway.

If you do not see flash audio player please install the latest flash player.

5 Comments

  1. On your program there wasa comment that voters needed to be better informed. Did you know that there is an organization that is doing something about that? A bunch of volunteers at Project Vote Smart have compiled and are maintaining a keyword searchable data base of all the public comments of presidential, congressional and gubernatorial candidates. They also track all the votes in every legislature. If you could mention this source to the radio audience you would have done them a great service. The site is at http://www.votesmart.org. I would appreciate your response to my comment.

    Comment by H Von Letkemann — December 19, 2007 @ 10:17 pm |  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

  2. A great resource. The fact that volunteers are doing this feels like democracy working. Would we trust it if it weren’t?

    Comment by BDP Staff — December 20, 2007 @ 12:20 pm |  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

  3. I follow the election integrity movement reasonably closely, and I have never heard of Charles Stewart. After listening to him evince no knowledge whatsoever about how elections can be stolen, I know why. Is there some reason you couldn’t have interviewed someone with a clue? There are incredible resources out there. My favorite place to start is http://www.bradblog.com , where you will find lots of information and, even more important, lots of links to primary source materials so you can make your own judgments about whom and what to believe.

    The Secretaries of State of California, Ohio and Colorado have recently done studies of the machines used in their states, and a review of those studies would make you far less accepting of Mr. Stewart’s fantasy of an error rate of less than one percent. To take but one relatively well publicized example, where does a machine that counts backwards after it reaches a threshold number of votes ( http://tinyurl.com/2w8d8u ) fit into his rosy scenario?

    You can do far better than this, and I sincerely hope you will. You’re absolutely right about how important this subject is. Now you just have to do it, and us, justice.

    Comment by Heather — December 26, 2007 @ 9:09 pm |  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

  4. Election day is not the Second Tuesday of November. It is the first Tuesday AFTER the first Monday in November. It is never later than November 9th.

    Comment by Desiree Baxter — December 31, 2007 @ 7:42 pm |  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

  5. I’m impressed by Iowa’s choice of Obama. Let’s hope the rugged individualists of NH also get a wide range of people out in record-breaking numbers and that they, too, “choose wisely”.

    Comment by Evelyn — January 4, 2008 @ 11:44 am |  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Leave a comment